'free book' link leads directly to -*surprise*- a commodity advert. for a product, kindle, normalizing empire censorship. am i just so out of it if i remember when free meant a community torrent
how thrilling is the thought of revolution. and why? well, has anyone but the children of empire defined 'revolution'? as satanism is an attempt to ritually-invert a monotheist theology, yet implicitly accepts the apparant truth of hebrew monotheism - so is revolution with regard to the militarization of empire, by means of its unifying commodity, information.
the result of control has elevated a three-faced monotheism, forever and conveniently at war with itself.
the only question of our day is, how can 'revolution' avoid fighting along any of empire's invisible sides, to instead peaceably subvert its notion of control?
anyone here have simple answers?
maybe easier to say - which 'revolution' should we support? leftist tourists all seem to like cuba. granted, fidel didnt leave many mass graves; and maybe cuba did prefer its slaves alive. but how many cubans who actually lived under fidel still voluntarily promote the wisdom of his control?
'free book' link leads directly to -*surprise*- a commodity advert. for a product, kindle, normalizing empire censorship. am i just so out of it if i remember when free meant a community torrent
To partially get around the terms of technoserfdom I just made the book available through libraries (Bibliotheca etc)
well if you provided such a link here, its not showing in California
The link apparently is your local library keyed into the network
how thrilling is the thought of revolution. and why? well, has anyone but the children of empire defined 'revolution'? as satanism is an attempt to ritually-invert a monotheist theology, yet implicitly accepts the apparant truth of hebrew monotheism - so is revolution with regard to the militarization of empire, by means of its unifying commodity, information.
the result of control has elevated a three-faced monotheism, forever and conveniently at war with itself.
the only question of our day is, how can 'revolution' avoid fighting along any of empire's invisible sides, to instead peaceably subvert its notion of control?
anyone here have simple answers?
maybe easier to say - which 'revolution' should we support? leftist tourists all seem to like cuba. granted, fidel didnt leave many mass graves; and maybe cuba did prefer its slaves alive. but how many cubans who actually lived under fidel still voluntarily promote the wisdom of his control?